
Rob Bishop, in his article "The Case for Federalism", fights for the implement of Federalism by both parties. He states what Federalism is, he says, "its government closer to the people." (Bishop) So its not less government, just more power is given to the people. This allows local government to shrink and grow according to the wants of its people. He goes on to say that this process of transition is a long one and has to be well thought out. He firmly believes that "it (Federalism) is the only constitutionally based, effective, and theoretically consistent means to bring about the systemic change of government that people want." (Bishop) Bishop believes we need to work towards this belief and away from Conservatism and Liberalism.
I agree with Bishop. Mainly because I also think that Federalism was the type of government the founding fathers were aiming for when they wrote the Constitution. Federalism allows "We the people" to play a role in government. I think that, lately, we have been picking the lesser of two evils, when in reality we need to change things up. It is said that if you do the same thing over and over expecting to see different results, then you are crazy. So to see the results we want, we must stand for what we believe and make sure our voice is heard. When the lesser of the two evils fails , we just switch to the other. This, to me, is not going to make the nation stronger. This is why i think we need to implement Federalism.
Bishop, Rob. "The Case for Federalism." NRO. NRO, 6 May 2010. Web. 13 May 2010.
federalism/rep-rob-bishop?page=2>.
He states what Federalism is, he says, "its government closer to the people." (Bishop) So its ==
ReplyDeleteHe states that Federalism is "government closer to the people" (Bishop). So it's
Watch out for the typos! You are a better writer than this.
Late and typos 20/50